Vinespinach, (basella), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Vinespinach, (basella), raw
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Vinespinach, (basella), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 19 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Carbs | 3.4 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Vinespinach, (basella), raw has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 24 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Calcium | 109 mg ★ | 38 mg | Vinespinach, (basella), raw has 187% more |
| Iron | 1.2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Vinespinach, (basella), raw has 74% more |
| Vitamin C | 102 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Vinespinach, (basella), raw has 420% more |
| Potassium | 510 mg ★ | 475 mg | Vinespinach, (basella), raw has 7% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.