Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) vs Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native)
2 wins
🏆
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
5 wins
| Nutrient | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 kcal | 246 kcal ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 15% more |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 24.04 g ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 32% more |
| Fat | 24.1 g | 15.94 g ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 51% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 83 mg | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 26 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 100% more |
| Iron | 9.4 mg ★ | 2.59 mg | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 263% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 335 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.