Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native)
2 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 92% more |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 46% more |
| Fat | 24.1 g | 2.08 g ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 1059% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
| Iron | 9.4 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 1224% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.