Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
| Protein | 2.08 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Carbs | 3.7 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
| Fat | 0.24 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 32% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 358 mg | 7 mg ★ | Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 5014% more |
| Calcium | 54 mg ★ | 17 mg | Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 218% more |
| Iron | 1.32 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 11% more |
| Vitamin C | 16 mg ★ | 0 mg | Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 284 mg ★ | 172 mg | Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.