Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 20 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more
Protein 2.08 g 2.01 g Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 3% more
Carbs 3.7 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more
Fat 0.24 g 0.15 g Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 60% more
Fiber 1.9 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 358 mg 36 mg Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 894% more
Calcium 54 mg 38 mg Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 42% more
Iron 1.32 mg 0.69 mg Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 91% more
Vitamin C 16 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more
Potassium 284 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.