Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 20 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more
Protein 2.08 g 2.01 g Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 3% more
Carbs 3.7 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more
Fat 0.24 g 0.15 g Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 60% more
Fiber 1.9 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 122 mg 36 mg Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 239% more
Calcium 54 mg 38 mg Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 42% more
Iron 1.32 mg 0.69 mg Water convolvulus, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 91% more
Vitamin C 16 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more
Potassium 284 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.