Water convolvulus,raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Water convolvulus,raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Water convolvulus,raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 19 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Protein | 2.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Water convolvulus,raw has 29% more |
| Carbs | 3.13 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Water convolvulus,raw has 33% more |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 113 mg | 36 mg ★ | Water convolvulus,raw has 214% more |
| Calcium | 77 mg ★ | 38 mg | Water convolvulus,raw has 103% more |
| Iron | 1.67 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Water convolvulus,raw has 142% more |
| Vitamin C | 55 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Water convolvulus,raw has 181% more |
| Potassium | 312 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.