Yambean (jicama), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Yambean (jicama), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Yambean (jicama), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 36 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
| Protein | 0.72 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Carbs | 8.23 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
| Fat | 0.09 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 242 mg | 36 mg ★ | Yambean (jicama), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 572% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.57 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 17% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Potassium | 135 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.