Yambean (jicama), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Yambean (jicama), raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Yambean (jicama), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 38 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Protein | 0.72 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Carbs | 8.82 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Fat | 0.09 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Fiber | 4.9 g ★ | 3.3 g | Yambean (jicama), raw has 48% more |
| Sugar | 1.8 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.6 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Vitamin C | 20.2 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Yambean (jicama), raw has 3% more |
| Potassium | 150 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.