Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Amaranth grain, uncooked
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Amaranth grain, uncooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 371 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Amaranth grain, uncooked has 312% more |
| Protein | 13.56 g ★ | 2.01 g | Amaranth grain, uncooked has 575% more |
| Carbs | 65.25 g ★ | 20.71 g | Amaranth grain, uncooked has 215% more |
| Fat | 7.02 g | 0.15 g ★ | Amaranth grain, uncooked has 4580% more |
| Fiber | 6.7 g ★ | 3.3 g | Amaranth grain, uncooked has 103% more |
| Sugar | 1.69 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 159 mg ★ | 38 mg | Amaranth grain, uncooked has 318% more |
| Iron | 7.61 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Amaranth grain, uncooked has 1003% more |
| Vitamin C | 4.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Potassium | 508 mg ★ | 475 mg | Amaranth grain, uncooked has 7% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.