APPLEBEE'S, chicken tenders platter vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
APPLEBEE'S, chicken tenders platter
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | APPLEBEE'S, chicken tenders platter | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 297 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | APPLEBEE'S, chicken tenders platter has 230% more |
| Protein | 19.62 g ★ | 2.01 g | APPLEBEE'S, chicken tenders platter has 876% more |
| Carbs | 17.98 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Fat | 16.24 g | 0.15 g ★ | APPLEBEE'S, chicken tenders platter has 10727% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sugar | 0.36 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sodium | 740 mg | 36 mg ★ | APPLEBEE'S, chicken tenders platter has 1956% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Iron | 0.9 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | APPLEBEE'S, chicken tenders platter has 30% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 336 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 29% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.