APPLEBEE'S, coleslaw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
APPLEBEE'S, coleslaw
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | APPLEBEE'S, coleslaw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 120 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | APPLEBEE'S, coleslaw has 33% more |
| Protein | 0.79 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Carbs | 13.17 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Fat | 7.09 g | 0.15 g ★ | APPLEBEE'S, coleslaw has 4627% more |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
| Sugar | 9.33 g | 6.48 g ★ | APPLEBEE'S, coleslaw has 44% more |
| Sodium | 178 mg | 36 mg ★ | APPLEBEE'S, coleslaw has 394% more |
| Calcium | 36 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Iron | 0.26 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Vitamin C | 13.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Potassium | 156 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.