Arugula, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Arugula, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Arugula, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 79% more |
| Protein | 2.58 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
| Carbs | 3.65 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
| Fat | 0.66 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 66% more |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Sugar | 2.05 g | 0.87 g ★ | Arugula, raw has 136% more |
| Sodium | 27 mg | 7 mg ★ | Arugula, raw has 286% more |
| Calcium | 160 mg ★ | 17 mg | Arugula, raw has 841% more |
| Iron | 1.46 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 2% more |
| Vitamin C | 15 mg ★ | 0 mg | Arugula, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 369 mg ★ | 172 mg | Arugula, raw has 115% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.