Arugula, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Arugula, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Arugula, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Protein | 2.58 g ★ | 2.01 g | Arugula, raw has 28% more |
| Carbs | 3.65 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Fat | 0.66 g | 0.15 g ★ | Arugula, raw has 340% more |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Sugar | 2.05 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Sodium | 27 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
| Calcium | 160 mg ★ | 38 mg | Arugula, raw has 321% more |
| Iron | 1.46 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Arugula, raw has 112% more |
| Vitamin C | 15 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
| Potassium | 369 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.