Barley malt flour vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Barley malt flour
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Barley malt flour | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 361 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Barley malt flour has 301% more |
| Protein | 10.28 g ★ | 2.01 g | Barley malt flour has 411% more |
| Carbs | 78.3 g ★ | 20.71 g | Barley malt flour has 278% more |
| Fat | 1.84 g | 0.15 g ★ | Barley malt flour has 1127% more |
| Fiber | 7.1 g ★ | 3.3 g | Barley malt flour has 115% more |
| Sugar | 0.8 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 37 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Iron | 4.71 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Barley malt flour has 583% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Potassium | 224 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.