Barley, pearled, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Barley, pearled, cooked
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Barley, pearled, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Barley, pearled, cooked has 37% more |
| Protein | 2.26 g ★ | 2.01 g | Barley, pearled, cooked has 12% more |
| Carbs | 28.22 g ★ | 20.71 g | Barley, pearled, cooked has 36% more |
| Fat | 0.44 g | 0.15 g ★ | Barley, pearled, cooked has 193% more |
| Fiber | 3.8 g ★ | 3.3 g | Barley, pearled, cooked has 15% more |
| Sugar | 0.28 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Sodium | 3 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 1.33 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Barley, pearled, cooked has 93% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.