Beef, Australian, imported, Wagyu, seam fat, Aust. marble score 9, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, Australian, imported, Wagyu, seam fat, Aust. marble score 9, raw
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, Australian, imported, Wagyu, seam fat, Aust. marble score 9, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 627 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, Australian, imported, Wagyu, seam fat, Aust. marble score 9, raw has 423% more |
| Protein | 5.16 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, Australian, imported, Wagyu, seam fat, Aust. marble score 9, raw has 17% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 67.33 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, Australian, imported, Wagyu, seam fat, Aust. marble score 9, raw has 3407% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 27 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, Australian, imported, Wagyu, seam fat, Aust. marble score 9, raw has 286% more |
| Calcium | 2 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Iron | 0.91 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 39% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.