Bologna, beef and pork, low fat vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, beef and pork, low fat
5 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 77% more |
| Protein | 11.5 g ★ | 2.69 g | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 328% more |
| Carbs | 2.6 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 91% more |
| Fat | 19.3 g | 0.28 g ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 6793% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.05 g | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1108 mg | 382 mg ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 190% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg ★ | 10 mg | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 10% more |
| Iron | 0.66 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 230% more |
| Potassium | 156 mg ★ | 35 mg | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 346% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.