Bologna, beef and pork vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, beef and pork
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, beef and pork | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 308 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Bologna, beef and pork has 157% more |
| Protein | 15.2 g ★ | 4.4 g | Bologna, beef and pork has 245% more |
| Carbs | 5.49 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Fat | 24.59 g | 1.92 g ★ | Bologna, beef and pork has 1181% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 4.42 g | 0.87 g ★ | Bologna, beef and pork has 408% more |
| Sodium | 960 mg | 7 mg ★ | Bologna, beef and pork has 13614% more |
| Calcium | 85 mg ★ | 17 mg | Bologna, beef and pork has 400% more |
| Iron | 1.21 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.8 mg ★ | 0 mg | Bologna, beef and pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg ★ | 172 mg | Bologna, beef and pork has 83% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.