Bologna, beef and pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, beef and pork
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, beef and pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 308 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Bologna, beef and pork has 242% more |
| Protein | 15.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bologna, beef and pork has 656% more |
| Carbs | 5.49 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Fat | 24.59 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bologna, beef and pork has 16293% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 4.42 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Sodium | 960 mg | 36 mg ★ | Bologna, beef and pork has 2567% more |
| Calcium | 85 mg ★ | 38 mg | Bologna, beef and pork has 124% more |
| Iron | 1.21 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Bologna, beef and pork has 75% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.