Bologna, chicken, pork, beef vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, chicken, pork, beef
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, chicken, pork, beef | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 272 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Bologna, chicken, pork, beef has 202% more |
| Protein | 11.33 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bologna, chicken, pork, beef has 464% more |
| Carbs | 5.61 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Fat | 22.73 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bologna, chicken, pork, beef has 15053% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1120 mg | 36 mg ★ | Bologna, chicken, pork, beef has 3011% more |
| Calcium | 92 mg ★ | 38 mg | Bologna, chicken, pork, beef has 142% more |
| Iron | 1.25 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Bologna, chicken, pork, beef has 81% more |
| Vitamin C | 15.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Potassium | 313 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.