Bologna, chicken, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, chicken, pork
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, chicken, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 336 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Bologna, chicken, pork has 273% more |
| Protein | 10.31 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bologna, chicken, pork has 413% more |
| Carbs | 4.19 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Fat | 30.61 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bologna, chicken, pork has 20307% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1240 mg | 36 mg ★ | Bologna, chicken, pork has 3344% more |
| Calcium | 196 mg ★ | 38 mg | Bologna, chicken, pork has 416% more |
| Iron | 1.12 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Bologna, chicken, pork has 62% more |
| Vitamin C | 13.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Potassium | 162 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.