Bologna, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, pork
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 247 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Bologna, pork has 174% more |
| Protein | 15.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bologna, pork has 661% more |
| Carbs | 0.73 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Fat | 19.87 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bologna, pork has 13147% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 907 mg | 36 mg ★ | Bologna, pork has 2419% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.77 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Bologna, pork has 12% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 281 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.