Broccoli raab, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Broccoli raab, cooked
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Broccoli raab, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Protein | 3.83 g ★ | 2.01 g | Broccoli raab, cooked has 91% more |
| Carbs | 3.12 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Fat | 0.52 g | 0.15 g ★ | Broccoli raab, cooked has 247% more |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
| Sugar | 0.62 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Sodium | 56 mg | 36 mg ★ | Broccoli raab, cooked has 56% more |
| Calcium | 118 mg ★ | 38 mg | Broccoli raab, cooked has 211% more |
| Iron | 1.27 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Broccoli raab, cooked has 84% more |
| Vitamin C | 37 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Broccoli raab, cooked has 89% more |
| Potassium | 343 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.