Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 146 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 22% more |
| Protein | 32.51 g ★ | 4.4 g | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 639% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.8 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 41 mg | 7 mg ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 486% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Iron | 3.76 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 152% more |
| Potassium | 376 mg ★ | 172 mg | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 119% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.