Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 146 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 62% more |
| Protein | 32.51 g ★ | 2.01 g | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 1517% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 1100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 41 mg | 36 mg ★ | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 14% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 3.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Buffalo, free range, top round steak, cooked (Shoshone Bannock) has 445% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 376 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.