Bulgur, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bulgur, cooked
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Bulgur, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
| Protein | 3.08 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bulgur, cooked has 53% more |
| Carbs | 18.58 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Fat | 0.24 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bulgur, cooked has 60% more |
| Fiber | 4.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Bulgur, cooked has 36% more |
| Sugar | 0.1 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 0.96 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Bulgur, cooked has 39% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 68 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.