Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
Nutrient Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 573 kcal 90 kcal Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 537% more
Protein 9.51 g 2.01 g Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 373% more
Carbs 50.22 g 20.71 g Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 142% more
Fat 37.07 g 0.15 g Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 24613% more
Fiber 10.4 g 3.3 g Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 215% more
Sugar 26.92 g 6.48 g Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 315% more
Sodium 9 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more
Calcium 840 mg 38 mg Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 2111% more
Iron 3.56 mg 0.69 mg Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 416% more
Vitamin C 27.3 mg 19.6 mg Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds has 39% more
Potassium 0 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.