Candies, Tamarind vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Candies, Tamarind
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Candies, Tamarind | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 331 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Candies, Tamarind has 268% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 91.96 g ★ | 20.71 g | Candies, Tamarind has 344% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Sugar | 78.57 g | 6.48 g ★ | Candies, Tamarind has 1113% more |
| Sodium | 1643 mg | 36 mg ★ | Candies, Tamarind has 4464% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 309 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 35% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.