Chili with beans, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chili with beans, canned
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Chili with beans, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 103 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Chili with beans, canned has 14% more |
| Protein | 6.12 g ★ | 2.01 g | Chili with beans, canned has 204% more |
| Carbs | 13.24 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Fat | 3.76 g | 0.15 g ★ | Chili with beans, canned has 2407% more |
| Fiber | 3.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Equal |
| Sugar | 1.65 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Sodium | 423 mg | 36 mg ★ | Chili with beans, canned has 1075% more |
| Calcium | 47 mg ★ | 38 mg | Chili with beans, canned has 24% more |
| Iron | 3.43 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Chili with beans, canned has 397% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Potassium | 365 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.