Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
| Protein | 1.64 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 63% more |
| Carbs | 4.31 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 80% more |
| Fat | 0.09 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 95% more |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Sugar | 2.01 g | 0.87 g ★ | Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 131% more |
| Sodium | 53 mg | 7 mg ★ | Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 657% more |
| Calcium | 69 mg ★ | 17 mg | Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 306% more |
| Iron | 3.74 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 151% more |
| Vitamin C | 23.9 mg ★ | 0 mg | Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 569 mg ★ | 172 mg | Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 231% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.