Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
Nutrient Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 20 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more
Protein 1.64 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more
Carbs 4.31 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more
Fat 0.09 g 0.15 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more
Fiber 2.3 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more
Sugar 2.01 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more
Sodium 53 mg 36 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 47% more
Calcium 69 mg 38 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 82% more
Iron 3.74 mg 0.69 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 442% more
Vitamin C 23.9 mg 19.6 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 22% more
Potassium 569 mg 475 mg Chrysanthemum, garland, cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 20% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.