Chrysanthemum leaves, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chrysanthemum leaves, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Chrysanthemum leaves, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 24 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Protein | 3.36 g ★ | 2.01 g | Chrysanthemum leaves, raw has 67% more |
| Carbs | 3.01 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Fat | 0.56 g | 0.15 g ★ | Chrysanthemum leaves, raw has 273% more |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 9% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 118 mg | 36 mg ★ | Chrysanthemum leaves, raw has 228% more |
| Calcium | 117 mg ★ | 38 mg | Chrysanthemum leaves, raw has 208% more |
| Iron | 2.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Chrysanthemum leaves, raw has 233% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Potassium | 567 mg ★ | 475 mg | Chrysanthemum leaves, raw has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.