Clif Z bar vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Clif Z bar
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Clif Z bar | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 416 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Clif Z bar has 362% more |
| Protein | 5.55 g ★ | 2.01 g | Clif Z bar has 176% more |
| Carbs | 74.72 g ★ | 20.71 g | Clif Z bar has 261% more |
| Fat | 9.72 g | 0.15 g ★ | Clif Z bar has 6380% more |
| Fiber | 8.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Clif Z bar has 152% more |
| Sugar | 30.56 g | 6.48 g ★ | Clif Z bar has 372% more |
| Sodium | 375 mg | 36 mg ★ | Clif Z bar has 942% more |
| Calcium | 444 mg ★ | 38 mg | Clif Z bar has 1068% more |
| Iron | 2.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Clif Z bar has 291% more |
| Vitamin C | 39.1 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Clif Z bar has 99% more |
| Potassium | 333 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.