Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 444 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type has 393% more |
| Protein | 3.63 g ★ | 2.01 g | Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type has 81% more |
| Carbs | 65.75 g ★ | 20.71 g | Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type has 217% more |
| Fat | 19.77 g | 0.15 g ★ | Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type has 13080% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 37.1 g | 6.48 g ★ | Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type has 473% more |
| Sodium | 276 mg | 36 mg ★ | Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type has 667% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 4.07 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Cookies, chocolate chip, commercially prepared, soft-type has 490% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 130 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.