Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 436 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat has 384% more |
| Protein | 2.94 g ★ | 2.01 g | Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat has 46% more |
| Carbs | 76.17 g ★ | 20.71 g | Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat has 268% more |
| Fat | 13.24 g | 0.15 g ★ | Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat has 8727% more |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more |
| Sugar | 41.18 g | 6.48 g ★ | Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat has 535% more |
| Sodium | 471 mg | 36 mg ★ | Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat has 1208% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 3.18 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Cookies, chocolate sandwich, with creme filling, reduced fat has 361% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 176 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.