Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 435 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips has 383% more |
| Protein | 4.55 g ★ | 2.01 g | Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips has 126% more |
| Carbs | 63.26 g ★ | 20.71 g | Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips has 205% more |
| Fat | 18.18 g | 0.15 g ★ | Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips has 12020% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 40.91 g | 6.48 g ★ | Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips has 531% more |
| Sodium | 341 mg | 36 mg ★ | Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips has 847% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 1.64 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Cookies, marshmallow, with rice cereal and chocolate chips has 138% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 227 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.