Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 457 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type has 408% more |
| Protein | 5.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type has 164% more |
| Carbs | 57.7 g ★ | 20.71 g | Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type has 179% more |
| Fat | 24.4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type has 16167% more |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 336 mg | 36 mg ★ | Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type has 833% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.89 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Cookies, peanut butter, commercially prepared, soft-type has 29% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.