Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 526 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered has 484% more |
| Protein | 3.45 g ★ | 2.01 g | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered has 72% more |
| Carbs | 65.99 g ★ | 20.71 g | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered has 219% more |
| Fat | 27.59 g | 0.15 g ★ | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered has 18293% more |
| Fiber | 3.4 g ★ | 3.3 g | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered has 3% more |
| Sugar | 51.72 g | 6.48 g ★ | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered has 698% more |
| Sodium | 138 mg | 36 mg ★ | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered has 283% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 1.24 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Cookies, sugar wafer, chocolate-covered has 80% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 311 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 35% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.