Cranberries, wild, bush, raw (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cranberries, wild, bush, raw (Alaska Native)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Cranberries, wild, bush, raw (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 55 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 75% more |
| Carbs | 12.3 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 42% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 90% more |
| Fiber | 6.7 g ★ | 2.8 g | Cranberries, wild, bush, raw (Alaska Native) has 139% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg | 7 mg ★ | Cranberries, wild, bush, raw (Alaska Native) has 271% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg ★ | 17 mg | Cranberries, wild, bush, raw (Alaska Native) has 18% more |
| Iron | 1 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 33% more |
| Vitamin C | 15 mg ★ | 0 mg | Cranberries, wild, bush, raw (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 140 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.