Cream substitute, liquid, light vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cream substitute, liquid, light
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Cream substitute, liquid, light | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
| Carbs | 9.1 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Cream substitute, liquid, light has 2233% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 9.1 g | 6.48 g ★ | Cream substitute, liquid, light has 40% more |
| Sodium | 60 mg | 36 mg ★ | Cream substitute, liquid, light has 67% more |
| Calcium | 1 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Iron | 0.56 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 177 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.