Cream substitute, liquid, with lauric acid oil and sodium caseinate vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Cream substitute, liquid, with lauric acid oil and sodium caseinate
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
Nutrient Cream substitute, liquid, with lauric acid oil and sodium caseinate Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 136 kcal 90 kcal Cream substitute, liquid, with lauric acid oil and sodium caseinate has 51% more
Protein 1 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more
Carbs 11.38 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more
Fat 9.97 g 0.15 g Cream substitute, liquid, with lauric acid oil and sodium caseinate has 6547% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 79 mg 36 mg Cream substitute, liquid, with lauric acid oil and sodium caseinate has 119% more
Calcium 9 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more
Iron 0.03 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 191 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.