Eppaw, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Eppaw, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Eppaw, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 150 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Eppaw, raw has 67% more |
| Protein | 4.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Eppaw, raw has 129% more |
| Carbs | 31.68 g ★ | 20.71 g | Eppaw, raw has 53% more |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Eppaw, raw has 1100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 12 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Calcium | 110 mg ★ | 38 mg | Eppaw, raw has 189% more |
| Iron | 1.15 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Eppaw, raw has 67% more |
| Vitamin C | 13 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Potassium | 340 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.