Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 15 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Protein | 1.15 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Carbs | 3.07 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 86% more |
| Fat | 0.18 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 91% more |
| Fiber | 2.8 g ★ | 2.8 g | Equal |
| Sugar | 0.23 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Sodium | 19 mg | 7 mg ★ | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added has 171% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg ★ | 17 mg | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added has 171% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 52% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.3 mg ★ | 0 mg | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added has 0% more |
| Potassium | 245 mg ★ | 172 mg | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added has 42% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.