Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 15 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Protein | 1.15 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 43% more |
| Carbs | 3.07 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Fat | 0.18 g | 0.15 g ★ | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added has 20% more |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
| Sugar | 0.23 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Sodium | 19 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg ★ | 38 mg | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added has 21% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Escarole, cooked, boiled, drained, no salt added has 4% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Potassium | 245 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.