Fast foods, biscuit, with ham vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fast foods, biscuit, with ham
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fast foods, biscuit, with ham | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 342 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fast foods, biscuit, with ham has 280% more |
| Protein | 11.85 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fast foods, biscuit, with ham has 490% more |
| Carbs | 38.75 g ★ | 20.71 g | Fast foods, biscuit, with ham has 87% more |
| Fat | 16.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fast foods, biscuit, with ham has 10767% more |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Sugar | 1.97 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sodium | 974 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fast foods, biscuit, with ham has 2606% more |
| Calcium | 142 mg ★ | 38 mg | Fast foods, biscuit, with ham has 274% more |
| Iron | 2.41 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fast foods, biscuit, with ham has 249% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 174 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.