Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 276 kcal 90 kcal Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise has 207% more
Protein 10.94 g 2.01 g Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise has 444% more
Carbs 27.4 g 20.71 g Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise has 32% more
Fat 13.59 g 0.15 g Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise has 8960% more
Fiber 1.4 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more
Sugar 3.4 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more
Sodium 617 mg 36 mg Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise has 1614% more
Calcium 72 mg 38 mg Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise has 89% more
Iron 1.71 mg 0.69 mg Fast Foods, crispy chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce and mayonnaise has 148% more
Vitamin C 0.3 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more
Potassium 179 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.