Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 182 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread has 102% more |
| Protein | 17.34 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread has 763% more |
| Carbs | 16.78 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Fat | 4.57 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread has 2947% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 3.08 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Sodium | 427 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread has 1086% more |
| Calcium | 62 mg ★ | 38 mg | Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread has 63% more |
| Iron | 1.58 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fast Foods, grilled chicken filet sandwich, with lettuce, tomato and spread has 129% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Potassium | 197 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.