Fish, herring, Pacific, flesh, air-dried, packed in oil (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, herring, Pacific, flesh, air-dried, packed in oil (Alaska Native)
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, herring, Pacific, flesh, air-dried, packed in oil (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 489 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, herring, Pacific, flesh, air-dried, packed in oil (Alaska Native) has 308% more |
| Protein | 44.5 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, herring, Pacific, flesh, air-dried, packed in oil (Alaska Native) has 911% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 34.6 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, herring, Pacific, flesh, air-dried, packed in oil (Alaska Native) has 1702% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.