Fish, tuna salad vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, tuna salad
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, tuna salad | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 187 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, tuna salad has 108% more |
| Protein | 16.04 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, tuna salad has 698% more |
| Carbs | 9.41 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Fat | 9.26 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, tuna salad has 6073% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 402 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, tuna salad has 1017% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 1 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fish, tuna salad has 45% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Potassium | 178 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.